Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 800mm F 5 6E FL ED VR Avis | 54 Données comparées

The Photography Life review identifies the Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 800mm f/5.6E FL ED VR as a top-tier performer, boasting extreme optical sharpness that outclasses the 600mm f/4G VR. Key advantages include its 4,590-gram weight, which is lighter than previous iterations due to fluorite elements, and the exceptional performance of the included TC800-1.25E ED teleconverter, which extends the reach to 1000mm at f/7.1 with minimal sharpness loss. However, the lens is described as a bulky, heavy tool that requires specialized supports, such as a sturdy gimbal head, for effective operation. Optically, it exhibits significant ghosting and flare in back-lit scenarios despite the Nano Crystal Coat, and some users reported autofocus tracking issues on older camera bodies like the D4s.

Ken Rockwell’s review of the Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 800mm f/5.6E FL ED VR highlights the lens as a significant technical leap for Nikon, featuring an electronically controlled diaphragm and advanced fluorite elements that provide spectacular sharpness and effective Vibration Reduction (VR). While praising its optical excellence, Rockwell notes that these features bring Nikon up to speed with long-standing competitor, Canon, often highlighting that it is a highly specialized tool for professionals. The lens delivers pristine, chromatic-aberration-free images with an internal focusing design. However, significant drawbacks include its extreme price, immense weight, and lack of an aperture ring, which makes it incompatible with older manual-focus Nikon bodies.

The review on NikonGear centers on the Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 800mm f/5.6E FL ED VR lens, highlighting its position as a highly desirable super-telephoto prime designed for sports, wildlife, and news photography. A major pros discussed by users is its absolute stellar optical performance, which provides exceptionally sharp and usable images even when shooting wide open or under challenging conditions. Because of this elite image quality, reviewers note that the lens should not be strictly restricted to action sports and can be heavily utilized across various demanding fields of photography. However, the review points out clear drawbacks to consider before investment. A significant hardware con is a recurring tripod mount and collar positioning issue, which is described as a frustrating design flaw that limits aftermarket replacement foot workarounds. Additionally, user context points out severe practical limitations, such as the lens being notoriously back-ordered and difficult to purchase, alongside an incredibly restrictive price tag of over $10,000 to $17,000 that places it far out of reach for casual photographers. Reddit ·r/