Samsung Gear 2 Avis | 126 Données comparées

The Samsung Gear 2 improves upon its predecessor with a refined, IP67 water-resistant design featuring a 1.63-inch Super AMOLED display and a more intuitive, camera-integrated body. Key pros include a responsive Tizen OS, a two-to-three-day battery life, and added functionality like a heart rate monitor and IR blaster. However, the device is hindered by its strict Samsung ecosystem limitation, a high price point, and a small app ecosystem, with some features still feeling gimmicky.

The Samsung Gear 2, reviewed by PCMag, is a refined, "fully realized" successor to the original Galaxy Gear, featuring a brushed metal design, an IP67 rating, a heart-rate monitor, and an IR blaster. Its 1.63-inch Super AMOLED display is a standout feature, and the device allows for interchangeable 22mm watchbands. The smartwatch is powered by Tizen OS, providing a responsive interface for fitness tracking and music playback. PCMag UKWhile performance is fluid, the Gear 2’s battery life is limited to roughly two to three days. A significant drawback is its ecosystem lock, restricting compatibility solely to Samsung smartphones. Furthermore, the app ecosystem is sparse and the $299.99 price point is high. PCMag concludes that the camera is mostly superfluous, noting that the $100 cheaper Gear 2 Neo offers better value for Samsung users.

The Samsung Gear 2 represents a significant evolution in wearable tech, utilizing Tizen OS for a smoother interface and improved three-day battery life. Key refinements include a slimmer, water-resistant chassis, a better-placed 2-megapixel camera, and an IR blaster, all contributing to a more functional, premium device. However, the, watch is limited by a sparse app ecosystem, exclusivity to Samsung smartphones, and a high price tag.

The Samsung Galaxy Gear 2 is praised for its design improvements, featuring a sleeker aesthetic, a vibrant Super AMOLED screen, a relocated camera, a heart rate monitor, and an IR blaster. However, the experience is severely hindered by the Tizen operating system's lack of apps, a frustrating user interface, and strict compatibility requirements with specific Samsung smartphones. Priced at $299, the device is considered a premature product that offers limited practical utility, making it a difficult recommendation for consumers, says The Oklahoman.

The Android Central review highlights the Gear 2, Gear 2 Neo, and Gear Fit as Tizen-based improvements over the original Galaxy Gear, featuring vibrant Super AMOLED screens, 2-3 day battery life, and IP67 water resistance. While the Gear 2 and Neo offer premium build, IR blasters, and music storage, the Gear Fit targets fitness users with a unique, slim, curved design. Significant drawbacks include compatibility restricted solely to Samsung Galaxy devices, inconsistent heart-rate tracking, and frustrating proprietary charging cradles.

The WhistleOut review of the Samsung Galaxy Gear 2 highlights it as a significant, more refined, and comfortable improvement over its predecessor, featuring a relocated speaker, IP67 water resistance, and the ability to swap bands. Key functionality includes an integrated IR blaster and a customizable home button, though the device suffers from a lackluster 2-megapixel camera and limited software customization. While a well-made, early-generation device, the Gear 2 ultimately falls short of being essential due to a two-day battery life and functions that often feel less efficient than using a smartphone.

The Samsung Gear 2 features a premium, refined design with a 1.63-inch Super AMOLED display, swappable straps, and functional additions like an IR blaster, camera, and heart rate monitor. Despite improved battery life, the device is restricted by high costs, a closed Samsung ecosystem, and a 2MP camera with poor resolution. While offering solid, 3-4 day battery performance, it requires a finicky charging adapter and significantly drains connected smartphones, making its high price hard to justify. Wareable

The Samsung Gear 2 features a improved design with a camera on the body, 22mm strap compatibility, and superior Tizen OS performance over the original, while offering 2-3 day battery life. It includes a 1.63-inch Super AMOLED screen, a heart rate monitor, and an IR blaster, though it remains bulky and locked to the Samsung ecosystem. Key drawbacks include inconsistent heart rate tracking during exercise, a high price point, and a limited app ecosystem. For more, visit TechRadar.

In a June 2014 review for The Verge, Dan Seifert notes that the Samsung Gear 2 offers superior hardware over its predecessor, featuring a metal design with a 1.63-inch Super AMOLED display and 22mm interchangeable bands. Powered by Tizen OS, it achieves 2.5 days of battery life, though its "parlor trick" features like the IR blaster and heart rate monitor provide limited utility. Despite improvements, the device remains locked to Samsung smartphones and relies on a cumbersome, easy-to-lose charging adapter. The review highlights that the $299 price tag is steep for a device with limited apps, clunky voice controls (S Voice), and restricted ecosystem integration. While praising the vibrant screen, design, and improved battery, the critique focuses on the lack of essential, daily-use functionality. Ultimately, the Gear 2 is deemed a "better product" but not a "better buy," suggesting users wait for broader Android Wear options.

The Samsung Gear 2, running on the Tizen OS, features a refined, water-resistant design with a 1.63-inch Super AMOLED display, a 2-megapixel camera, a heart rate monitor, and an IR blaster. Pros include a vastly improved notification system, standalone music playback, and a battery life lasting over three days. However, the device is limited to Samsung-only compatibility, with flawed S-Health syncing and an often inaccurate heart rate sensor during exercise. CNETWhile technically impressive, the Gear 2 is deemed a niche product with a limited app library and a high $299 price tag, partly due to an unnecessary camera. For most users, opting for the cheaper Gear 2 Neo or waiting for Android Wear platforms is recommended. CNET