Samsung Galaxy Gear Avis | 126 Données comparées

The SamMobile review characterizes the Samsung Galaxy Gear (SM-V700) as a bold but "rushed" first-generation, companion smartwatch, highlighting the 1.63-inch Super AMOLED display and the 1.9-megapixel camera as key pros. While the device offers a pleasant interface with intuitive, gesture-based navigation and convenient hands-free calling, it is criticized for a thick, industrial design. Key drawbacks include limited third-party app support, restricted compatibility, and a battery that requires daily charging. SamMobile

The Samsung Galaxy Gear is characterized as a bold but flawed first-generation wearable that operates primarily as a smartphone accessory, featuring a vibrant 1.63-inch Super AMOLED display and useful notification capabilities for calls and SMS. While praised for its screen, the device is criticized for a bulky, uncomfortable design with a stiff strap, and a 1.9-megapixel camera that is hindered by a loud, unavoidable shutter noise. WhistleOutFunctionally, the Galaxy Gear struggles with limited daily battery life, necessitating frequent recharging, and a lack of support for essential notifications beyond basic calls and texts. The "smart relay" feature often forces users back to their phones, rendering the device's convenience, such as the wrist-based camera and speaker, largely underwhelming. WhistleOutUltimately, the review finds that the high price tag and physical discomfort—specifically the painful, unyielding strap and, in some cases, the device's bulk—outweigh its limited benefits. The Gear is positioned as a novel, yet unrefined accessory rather than a necessary companion, making it hard to recommend for daily use.

The Samsung Galaxy Gear (SM-V700) is a pioneering first-generation smartwatch that functions as a phone companion, offering features like a 1.63-inch Super AMOLED screen, an 800MHz processor, and a 1.9-megapixel camera built into the strap. GadgetGuy's review highlights the device's premium, durable feel with its stainless steel body, yet notes it is plagued by severe limitations, including restricted compatibility with only select Samsung devices and a battery that rarely lasts beyond a day. While praised for its quick-shot camera, pedometer, and hands-free calling capabilities, the watch is hampered by a required charging cradle, a non-interchangeable strap, and a bulky design.

PCMag describes the Samsung Galaxy Gear as an ambitious but flawed $299.99 "science project" featuring a sharp 1.63-inch Super AMOLED display, a 1.9-megapixel strap camera, and functional, albeit novel, call capabilities. However, significant drawbacks include extremely limited compatibility with only select Samsung devices at launch, disappointing battery life, and a sluggish, "baffling" user interface lacking key functionality. While the metal design appears sharp, the watch is considered bulky, and the overall experience is too expensive and frustrating for the average user, concluding that better, more refined iterations are necessary.

A 2013 Guardian analysis argued the Samsung Galaxy Gear was a rushed, "prototype" product designed to preempt Apple, resulting in a device lacking a clear purpose or "killer" functionality. While boasting technical ambition through integration of a camera, microphone, and apps like Evernote, the device was crippled by a sluggish interface, poor 25-hour battery life, and high £299 price point. The analysis concluded that the Gear's limited compatibility—working only with the Note 3—and "bulky" design made it a flawed "version 0.1" release.

In October 2013, Business Insider described the Samsung Galaxy Gear as a sturdy, high-quality, but "chunky" first-generation wearable that felt like a shrunken-down smartphone rather than a fashionable device. While praising its vibrant 1.63-inch Super AMOLED display and convenient notification system, the review highlighted significant downsides, including a slow S Voice assistant, awkward camera positioning, and limited,, restrictive, app support. The device's overall utility was hampered by poor third-party app integration (lacking Gmail, Twitter, or Facebook content) and exclusive compatibility with the Galaxy Note 3, making it a frustrating experience that often forced users back to their phones.

The Samsung Galaxy Gear offers a premium design with a high-quality stainless steel body and a vibrant 1.63-inch Super AMOLED screen. Pros include the S Voice capability for hands-free calling and messaging, plus a 1.9-megapixel camera built into the strap. However, the device suffers from a very limited, closed ecosystem that is initially compatible only with the Galaxy Note 3, representing a significant con. Other drawbacks highlighted include the need for a proprietary charging cradle and a battery that often struggles to last a full day. Tech Guide concludes that while the Gear is a sturdy, functional "first attempt," it lacks the polished design and broad functionality required for mass-market appeal. Its features, such as a pedometer and media controls, are useful for early adopters but not enough to overcome its bulky form and limited app support.

The Samsung Galaxy Gear is a "companion device" featuring a vibrant 1.63-inch Super AMOLED display, a unique 1.9-megapixel autofocus camera, and call functionality. However, it is hindered by limited compatibility, a high $299 price, a "baffling" interface, and poor battery life. Ultimately, it feels more like a "compelling science project" than a polished consumer product, with its limited functionality making it hard to recommend at launch.

The WIRED review characterizes the original Samsung Galaxy Gear as a "too little, too soon" device, highlighting its sharp 1.63-inch Super AMOLED display and sturdy, stylish brushed metal design as key pros. Significant cons include extremely limited compatibility with only a few Samsung devices at launch, a high $299 price tag, and poor battery life that lasts only a day or two. While praised for its, the device is criticized for lacking essential email/social app support and offering a clunky user experience, ultimately falling short of being a necessary accessory.

The CNET review of the Samsung Galaxy Gear describes the smartwatch as an ambitious, $299 device prioritizing style with a 1.6-inch AMOLED display and a built-in 1.9-megapixel camera. While offering solid build quality and basic functionalities like voice calling and step tracking, the device is plagued by a confusing interface, unreliable "S Voice" controls, and a restrictive, clunky charging cradle. Major drawbacks include extremely limited compatibility with only the Galaxy Note 3 at launch, lack of native email/social notifications, and a battery life that struggles to last a full day.

The SMH hands-on review of the Samsung Galaxy Gear highlights a premium, well-built design featuring a 1.63-inch Super AMOLED display and a 1.9-megapixel camera built into the strap. While physically comfortable to wear, the device's functionality is mixed, serving as a companion with dual microphones, a speaker, and basic app support, though with a poorly positioned camera. Major drawbacks identified include limited initial device compatibility, short battery life requiring a "fiddly" charger, and limited app integration for notifications.

The Samsung Galaxy Gear, reviewed by IGN, is characterized as a well-built but incomplete device that fails to justify its $300 price tag, offering a premium stainless steel design with a robust strap. While the 1.63-inch Super AMOLED display is sharp and vibrant, the screen's failure to remain constantly lit and the device's heavy, bulky feel are notable drawbacks. Pros include an innovative, functional 1.9-megapixel camera, but these are outweighed by cons like a one-day battery life, limited app ecosystem, and strict compatibility requirements.

In a 2013 review for The Verge, Vlad Savov described the Samsung Galaxy Gear as a bulky "tank for your wrist" that feels more like a shrunken-down smartphone than a refined timepiece. While praised for its sturdy steel construction and vibrant Super AMOLED display, the device is criticized for being uncomfortable and featuring a non-interchangeable strap. Functionally, the review highlights pros such as a surprisingly decent 1.9-megapixel camera on the strap and an NFC-enabled charging cradle. However, significant cons include a laggy user interface, an unresponsive "gesture to wake" feature, poor battery life, and the requirement for a proprietary charging pod. Ultimately, The Verge concludes the Galaxy Gear is a "soulless" first attempt that fails to justify its $299 price tag. Due to limited compatibility with only the Galaxy Note 3 and a lack of meaningful apps, the watch feels more like an unfinished prototype than a consumer-ready product.