Lg Optimus Pad WiFi (1GB + 32GB) Avis | 168 Données comparées

The LG Optimus Pad is described as a well-built 8.9-inch tablet featuring a bright, high-quality IPS display and reliable performance from its Nvidia Tegra 2 processor. However, the device is heavily criticized for its high price point, poor battery life, and the ineffective, poorly implemented 3D camera system that requires anaglyph glasses for viewing. Ultimately, due to a lack of a microSD slot and stiff competition, the review advises against purchasing this device.

The Pocket-lint review of the LG Optimus Pad highlights its solid build, 8.9-inch 1280x768 display, and smooth performance from the Nvidia Tegra 2 processor running Android 3.0 Honeycomb. Key drawbacks include the gimmicky 3D camera feature, which requires red and blue glasses for on-device viewing, and the lack of a microSD card slot. Ultimately, with an "absurd" £749 price point, it is considered a niche product that struggles to compete with rivals like the iPad 2.

The LG Optimus Pad, reviewed by Expert Reviews, features a unique 8.9-inch display with a 1,280 x 768 resolution, offering a crisp visual experience in a compact form. While running Android 3.0 (Honeycomb) with 3G support, it is noted for being heavier and bulkier than competitors. The device is lauded for its quick, responsive performance and included productivity software, alongside its specialized 3D recording capabilities. Significant drawbacks highlighted include the lack of a microSD slot, which limits storage for large 3D video files. Furthermore, the 3D, dual-camera feature is deemed gimmicky by some, as the screen requires anaglyph glasses to view the 3D content. Finally, a high, unsubsidized launch price makes the tablet difficult to recommend over alternatives.

The TechSpot review of the LG Optimus Pad (T-Mobile G-Slate) highlights an 8.9-inch tablet featuring a solid industrial design, a 1280x768 display, and a fast 1GHz dual-core Nvidia Tegra 2 processor running Android 3.0 Honeycomb. Key pros include its manageable weight (630g), 4G capability, good battery life, and high-quality construction. However, the 3D cameras require 3D glasses or an external TV to view content properly, and the unit lacks a microSD slot for expanded storage. While the software experience is stable, the device faces limitations with limited tablet-optimized apps and a high $529-$749 price point.

The LG V900 Optimus Pad features an 8.9-inch IPS display (778:1 contrast) and Nvidia Tegra 2 dual-core performance running Android 3.0, aimed at a middle ground between 7 and 10-inch tablets. Key pros include a robust build, 3G/UMTS connectivity, an HDMI port, and capable performance alongside 32GB internal storage. However, the 3D video recording capabilities are considered a marketing gimmick requiring external hardware, and the device lacks expandable storage. NotebookcheckThe review highlights significant cons, including a high price point, poor outdoor visibility due to extreme screen reflections, and a weight/thickness disadvantage compared to the iPad 2. The 5 MP dual-camera setup delivers subpar 2D photo quality, and the battery life, while offering over 7 hours of Wi-Fi usage, is outperformed by rivals like the Motorola Xoom. Notebookcheck

The LG Optimus Pad features an 8.9-inch 15:9 display ideal for movies and a solid, soft-touch build, though it is hindered by a bulky 630g design, according to PhoneArena. While the Android 3.0 Honeycomb OS provides a smooth, fast experience, user experience is limited by a lack of optimized third-party apps and poor screen legibility in direct sunlight. The 3D camera functionality is considered a gimmick requiring specialized glasses for viewing, and the high price tag makes it difficult to recommend over competitors.

The LG Optimus Pad is praised for its portable 8.9-inch form factor and responsive Tegra 2 dual-core performance running Android 3.0, though it has a "chunky" design compared to the iPad 2. Its standout feature is dual 5MP cameras for 3D video, but this requires an external 3D TV or red-cyan glasses to view, as the screen itself is not 3D-compatible. Despite being a solid performer, the tablet is criticized for its high price, lack of storage expansion, and limited app ecosystem, leading to no recommendation.

The LG G-Slate, reviewed by Gizmodo in February 2011, was presented as a high-spec, 8.9-inch tablet offering a "pure" Android 3.0 Honeycomb experience, positioned between smaller devices and 10-inch competitors. While featuring solid hardware, 4G connectivity, and a desirable, portable form factor, the device was deemed "empty" and lacked a polished user experience, with the 3D rear camera described as a gimmick. Despite strengths in hardware quality, the pre-production unit exhibited sluggish, buggy software, and a potentially high price point. AI can make mistakes, so double-check responses Copy

The LG G-Slate, a 2011 Android 3.0 Honeycomb tablet, aimed to differentiate itself with 3D capabilities, including dual 5MP cameras for 3D video recording and a screen that required red/cyan glasses. While the 8.9-inch device offered premium build quality, 4G T-Mobile connectivity, and a snappy Tegra 2 processor, the 3D features were considered a disorienting, gimmicky, and dim experience. Despite its solid performance as a tablet, the G-Slate was held back by a high price, a proprietary charging port, and a poorly executed 3D implementation, leading to the conclusion that it was a solid device burdened by unnecessary features. Copy

The LG G-Slate, a T-Mobile flagship featuring an 8.9-inch display and 3D camera technology, launched with a powerful Nvidia Tegra 2 processor but suffered from a plastic, heavy construction. While offering snappy performance, the 3D features required outdated red/cyan glasses, limiting their utility. Running Android 3.0 (Honeycomb), the tablet boasted high-quality visuals and solid 4G performance, yet was hindered by a lack of optimized tablet applications. Significant drawbacks included a proprietary charger and poor battery life, making the 3D gimmickry feel like a failed experiment. Ultimately, the G-Slate struggled to justify its high on-contract price, falling short of competitors like the iPad 2 in design and refinement. Despite its internal power, it was deemed a device of compromises, balancing portability with excessive bulk and gimmicky features. Copy