Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 4G (1GB + 32GB) Avis | 168 Données comparées

The 2013 review of the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 (SM-T210) highlights a budget-friendly, compact tablet with solid build quality and good battery life, though it features a dated, glossy design. Performance is a significant drawback, as the Marvell dual-core processor and 1GB of RAM struggle with multitasking, and the 3-megapixel camera lacks autofocus. While the device includes useful features like an infrared port and expandable storage, it offers low value for money compared to contemporary alternatives, resulting in a device best suited for casual, light usage.

In a July 2013 review for AllThingsD, Bonnie Cha characterizes the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 as a versatile, 8-inch, Android 4.2.2-based tablet designed to fit between Samsung's 7-inch and 10.1-inch offerings, highlighting its slim, lightweight design and bright WXGA display. Key strengths, or pros, include the comfortable one-handed usability due to thin bezels, the useful Multi Window feature for multitasking, and the IR blaster/WatchOn app combination for remote control functionality, along with expandable storage via microSD. The central shortcoming, or con, is poor battery life, with the device only lasting five hours in testing, which is notably inferior to the competition. Furthermore, the $299.99 price point was considered high relative to its performance and competitors, reducing its overall value proposition, according to the review. WSJ

The Reviewed analysis highlights the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 for its excellent display, featuring high color accuracy and low reflectivity. However, the tablet is severely hindered by outdated dual-core processing hardware that underperforms compared to its competitors, leading to a "poor investment" verdict at its launch price. While the 8-inch form factor and IR blaster provide good portability and media control, the device's cheap, plastic build and low 188 PPI resolution make it unsuitable for users seeking high-end performance or screen clarity. Reviewed

The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 is a budget-focused, highly portable tablet featuring a slim, lightweight design with a 1024 x 600 resolution display that feels comfortable for one-handed use. While the device, reminiscent of the Galaxy S4, offers a sturdy plastic build and functional microSD expansion, it is hindered by a dual-core processor that struggles with intensive tasks. Key, specific drawbacks highlighted include limited internal storage, subpar camera quality, and a screen that lacks the sharpness of competitors like the Nexus 7. Performance is adequate for basic browsing and e-reading, but the TouchWiz interface, combined with modest specifications, results in occasional lag during heavy use. Ultimately, the tablet is positioned as a suitable entry-level device for children or casual users, rather than a powerhouse. It is recommended that those seeking better performance and screen quality look to more modern alternatives rather than this older model.

The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 is a thin, 1.1-pound tablet featuring a bright 444-lux display, loud speakers, and an IR blaster for TV control, providing a familiar experience for Samsung users. Despite these features, the device is hindered by significant performance lag, a lower-resolution 1280 x 800 screen, and a lack of advanced multitasking features compared to competitors. Ultimately, while boasting decent battery life, the $399 tablet struggles to justify its cost, with the review recommending alternative options for better performance and display quality. Laptop Mag

The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8-inch, as reviewed by PhoneArena, is a mid-range tablet highlighting exceptional portability with a lightweight, 314-gram design and an 8-inch, 1280 x 800 TFT display suitable for media consumption. It is powered by a 1.5 GHz dual-core Exynos 4212 processor and 1.5 GB of RAM, capable of running Samsung's Multi Window for multitasking and functioning as a TV remote via a built-in IR blaster. Despite its functional design, the tablet features a plastic construction that can feel slippery and less premium, with poorly positioned speakers that are easily muffled. While the 5-megapixel camera offers mediocre performance in low light, the device provides decent, though not market-leading, battery life compared to competitors like the Nexus 7.

The Verge's 2013 review of the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 and 10.1 concludes that, while functional, both tablets suffer from outdated plastic designs, unremarkable performance, and high prices compared to competitors. The 8.0-inch model is praised for its comfortable, light design and useful IR blaster, but criticized for inconsistent performance and poor standby battery life. Conversely, the 10.1-inch model is panned for "horribly jittery" scrolling, slow app loading, and lack of essential software features, despite having a decent display. The Verge

The PCMag review characterizes the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 as a well-built, thin, and lightweight tablet that faces stiff competition due to its $299.99 price point, which was high compared to rivals like the Google Nexus 7. Key strengths include an excellent 8-inch LCD display with high contrast and the inclusion of an IR emitter for use as a universal remote with the WatchON app. However, the device suffers from a finicky touchscreen with poor palm rejection and inferior battery life, lasting only 6 hours and 48 minutes in video testing.

The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 (10.1-inch) LTE, powered by an Intel Atom Z2560 processor, is a mid-range tablet highlighting increased portability, thinness, and built-in telephony/LTE functionality. Key advantages include solid battery life (approximately 7 hours in tests) and a lightweight design compared to its predecessor. However, the 1,280 x 800 display resolution is considered subpar for its class, and the device represents minor iterative upgrades rather than a significant performance leap. Priced at S$748 at launch, the device offers, at best, a "more of the same" experience, limiting its appeal to users strictly prioritizing LTE connectivity in a lightweight form factor.

The Android Central review positions the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 series as an entry-level, complementary line for existing Galaxy users, emphasizing a transition toward thin, lightweight designs rather than high-end performance. While praised for exceptional battery life, an IR blaster for TV control, and a familiar TouchWiz interface, the tablets are criticized for mediocre "middle-of-the-road" hardware specifications. Major drawbacks highlighted include lackluster 3.15 MP rear cameras, lagging display resolutions on the 7-inch model, and performance that fails to compete with top-tier alternatives.

The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 is a highly portable, 7.4mm thin, 314g mid-range tablet featuring an 8-inch WXGA display with vibrant colours and excellent viewing angles. Performance is driven by a 1.5GHz dual-core processor and 1.5GB of RAM, which, while capable of handling daily tasks, may suffer from frame drops during intense 3D gaming. Key advantages include the 4,450mAh battery providing over eight hours of video playback and the integrated IR blaster with the WatchOn app for universal TV control. Conversely, the device faces stiff competition from the Nexus 7 (2013) due to its £269 launch price, and its all-plastic construction lacks a premium feel. Other disadvantages highlighted include poorly positioned speakers that are easily muffled and a 5-megapixel rear camera that delivers only basic results. Furthermore, the heavy TouchWiz skin over Android may not suit all users.

The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 features a comfortable, slim design and a useful microSD card slot, but its plastic construction and 2013 launch price fail to compete with rivals like the iPad mini. While the 8-inch display is adequate and the battery offers solid, eight-hour-plus endurance, the device lacks premium build quality. Ultimately, mediocre camera performance and limited resolution make it hard to recommend, especially when compared to higher-spec competitors, according to Pocket-lint.

The PCMag review characterizes the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 as a minor, $400 update that feels dated due to older hardware and a low-resolution 1,280-by-800 display. While featuring a lighter, more portable design, the tablet's performance is hampered by middling speed and a lack of advanced TouchWiz features found on Samsung's higher-end models. Key pros include a functional IR blaster for universal remote use, a bright screen, and useful hardware additions like a microSD card slot. Conversely, significant cons are the poor 3.2-megapixel camera and a high price point that, at the time of review, made it a less competitive option than its rivals.

The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 is a budget-friendly, entry-level tablet that prioritizes improved, ergonomic design and portability over raw power. While the build is plastic, the device features thinner bezels, making it comfortable to hold and easy to carry. However, the tablet is heavily constrained by a low-resolution 1024 x 600 display and a dated dual-core processor that struggles with demanding tasks. Pros include excellent standby battery life, loud stereo speakers, and a microSD slot for expanding the limited 8GB of storage. The device provides a polished user experience but is held back by mediocre performance and the same screen resolution found in older, outdated models. Ultimately, despite these minor perks, the device is considered overpriced compared to more powerful, modern alternatives.

The HardwareZone review of the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 LTE identifies it as a "phablet in disguise" due to its full telephony functionality, combined with a slim, lightweight design and narrow bezels that offer excellent portability. Key pros include this high portability, comfortable one-handed use, and impressive battery life lasting nearly 8 hours. However, the device is held back by a low-resolution screen where pixels are visible, and a dual-core processor that falls short for demanding users. While offering an 8-inch screen with decent color, the review highlights the low pixel density and underwhelming performance as significant drawbacks, despite the inclusion of a "Reading Mode" for specific applications. The device is seen as a decent mid-range, yet expensive, option at S$668 for the LTE version, with the review suggesting the Galaxy Note 8.0 as a superior alternative for a similar price. Overall, it is considered an incremental upgrade that, despite its unique call features and good battery life, is outclassed by newer competitors in terms of display sharpness.

The Trusted Reviews analysis of the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 highlights a lightweight, 300g design with a functional microSD card slot, but criticizes the "plasticky" build quality. The 7-inch display is identified as a major drawback due to its low 1024 x 600 resolution, inaccurate colors, and poor viewing angles. Underwhelming performance, driven by a dated dual-core processor and inconsistent software, makes the device lag, leading the review to conclude the tablet is overpriced compared to competitors. Copy

The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 is described by Recombu as a budget-friendly device with a "chunky" design, featuring a comfortable, soft-touch white plastic body. While the build is sturdy with premium silver accents, the tablet is held back by a low-resolution 600x1024 TFT display with poor contrast and a 9.9mm thickness that feels dated. Performance is adequate for basic tasks, powered by a 1.2GHz dual-core processor and 1GB of RAM, though it struggles with multitasking and intensive browsing. Despite supporting Full HD video playback and providing a useful microSD slot for expansion, the device lacks modern features like NFC and an IR blaster. The 4000mAh battery provides solid, long-lasting power, but the overall package, including the 3-megapixel camera, is deemed to offer poor value for its sub-£200 price point. The review concludes the tablet feels out of date at launch, particularly when compared to superior alternatives like the Nexus 7. Copy

TechRadar's 2013 review of the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 highlights a lightweight, comfortable design with a great form factor, but criticizes its "below-par," plasticky build quality that feels cheap compared to competitors. While the screen offers excellent brightness, the device suffers from significant performance issues, featuring a "meagre" dual-core processor that struggles with multitasking and gaming. Ultimately, despite solid battery life for media consumption, the high price point and underwhelming performance lead to a recommendation to look at alternatives like the Nexus 7 or iPad mini. Copy

The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 is identified as a well-balanced, 2013-era tablet featuring a thin, lightweight, and ergonomic design with slim bezels that mirror the Galaxy S4's aesthetic. It boasts a bright, color-accurate 8-inch WXGA display and a 1.5GHz dual-core processor that ensures a smooth experience for daily tasks, enhanced by software features like Multi-Window and an IR blaster. However, the review notes drawbacks including a high $299.99 launch price, underwhelming 5-megapixel camera performance, a slippery plastic exterior, and the absence of NFC. Ultimately, the tablet is deemed a solid, well-constructed device that lacks the standout value or unique features of its competitors. Copy

The PCMag review characterizes the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 as a "pedestrian" update, offering a lightweight (1.12 pounds) and thin (0.31 inches) design that feels dated upon release, though it benefits from a standard micro USB port. While the device boasts a bright 1,280-by-800 TFT display, its resolution lags behind competitors like the Google Nexus 10, and the Intel Atom processor delivers "middling" performance plagued by multitasking slowdowns. Despite including a microSD slot and an IR blaster, the $399.99 tablet is hard to recommend due to poor camera quality, short battery life, and high price. Copy

The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 is described as a compact, lightweight, and well-built tablet featuring thin bezels, but it is criticized for using outdated internal components. While the 10.1-inch screen is bright, it is hampered by a mediocre 1,280x800 resolution that lacks sharpness. Performance issues, including significant lag, frequent app crashes, and overly sensitive capacitive buttons, make the user experience frustrating, and at a $399 price point, it lacks the high-end feel of competitors. Despite these flaws, the device offers functional benefits like a microSD card slot for expanded storage and an IR blaster for controlling televisions. Copy