Intel Celeron G6900t Avis | 78 Données comparées

The Intel Celeron G6900 and G6900T (Alder Lake-S) are entry-level, dual-core processors designed for basic computing, with the G6900 running at a higher 3.4 GHz compared to the 2.8 GHz, 35W G6900T. Benchmarks show the G6900T is roughly 15-18% slower than the G6900, but offers superior energy efficiency suitable for low-power, fanless, or NAS applications. Both chips lack hyper-threading and are generally limited to basic office tasks, serving as budget-friendly options. Pros include low cost and modern PCIe 5.0/DDR5 support, though significant cons include poor multitasking and unsuitability for modern gaming. For a detailed comparison, visit PassMark Software. Copy

The Intel Celeron G6900T (2022, 12th Gen) outperforms the Intel Core i7-950 (2009) in PassMark benchmarks, despite the i7's higher core count, with the G6900T scoring roughly 13% higher in multi-threaded tests and offering vastly superior single-thread performance. The Celeron's pros include a highly efficient 35W TDP and integrated UHD Graphics 710, while its main drawback is being limited to 2 cores and 2 threads. The i7-950's pros lie in its 4-core/8-thread architecture for legacy tasks, but it is heavily hampered by a 130W TDP, lack of integrated graphics, and obsolete LGA1366/DDR3 platform. For the full comparison, visit cpubenchmark.net.

The Intel Celeron G6900T (10nm, 2022) outperforms the Core i3-6100 (14nm, 2015) in single-threaded tasks by roughly 6% while offering superior power efficiency (35W vs. 51W TDP), DDR5 support, and PCIe 5.0. Conversely, the i3-6100 holds an 11–13% advantage in multi-threaded performance due to Hyper-Threading, though it is constrained by an older platform and slower DDR4 memory. The G6900T is ideal for efficient, modern budget systems, while the i3-6100 suits tasks requiring more thread capacity, despite the Celeron's 2-thread limitation causing bottlenecks. For detailed benchmarks, visit PassMark. Copy