NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 Avis | 118 Données comparées

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1630 The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1630 arrives woefully late to the budget GPU market with heavily cut-down architecture that severely limits its performance, landing it near the absolute bottom of modern graphics card benchmarks. Built on a lobotomized Turing TU117 architecture, Nvidia disabled half of the shader cores (leaving only 512) and halved the memory bus width to 64-bit with 4GB of GDDR6 VRAM. Priced laughably high at a soft MSRP of $199, it faces devastating internal and external competition. For the same price or less, consumers can buy the vastly superior GTX 1650 Super—which essentially doubles the 1630's specifications and performance—or AMD's Radeon RX 6400 and RX 6500 XT, making this card a poor value proposition that feels like "e-waste" intended mostly to mislead uninformed buyers through pre-built OEM desktops. Key Pros and Cons Pros: The card is demonstrably faster than the old GTX 1050, includes dedicated hardware video encoding capabilities (Pascal-era NVENC), and successfully manages 1080p medium settings at 30 fps in games. It also includes 4GB of VRAM, though its overall performance limitations mean...

The TechSpot review describes the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1630 as a deeply flawed budget card, citing its severely limited 512 CUDA cores and 64-bit memory bus as major performance bottlenecks. Gaming benchmarks showed abysmal performance at 1080p, with the card often trailing behind older, cheaper hardware like the GTX 1050 Ti by as much as 52%. While offering stable driver support and the NVENC video encoder, the card's high $150+ price tag results in poor value, prompting a recommendation to avoid it in favor of used alternatives like the GTX 1650 Super.