AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Avis | 78 Données comparées

Hardware Canucks' review of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X highlights their dominance in high-end desktop (HEDT) content creation, boasting 16 and 12 cores respectively. A major advantage is the inclusion of 64 PCIe Gen3 lanes for immense connectivity, alongside superior multi-threaded performance against Intel in tasks like rendering. However, the chips face cons regarding lower single-threaded IPC and higher gaming latencies compared to Skylake-X, requiring user management of UMA/NUMA modes for optimal performance. Additionally, the 180W TDP demands premium cooling solutions due to the large, hot-running integrated heat spreader (IHS).

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, reviewed by Digital Trends, marks a major entry into the HEDT market with 16 cores and 32 threads, offering unparalleled multi-core performance for tasks like 4K video editing and 3D rendering at a $1,000 price point. Key pros include its superior value against Intel alternatives, 64 PCIe lanes for extensive expansion, and a robust, albeit physically large, dual-die design. While offering immense power, the chip requires specialized, high-end cooling for its 180W TDP and necessitated expensive X399 motherboards, representing significant entry costs. To address performance quirks, AMD introduced software-based "Gaming" and "Creative" modes to manage thread scheduling efficiently. Ultimately, while a powerhouse for workstations, its single-core performance,, and gaming efficiency were noted to lag slightly behind high-frequency competitors in specific scenarios.

HotHardware's review of the original AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X highlights the processors as a disruptive HEDT force that directly challenged Intel's market dominance with up to 16 cores and 32 threads on the Zen architecture. The platform excelled at compute-intensive tasks, such as 3D rendering and video editing, while delivering strong gaming performance. Key advantages identified include the exceptional multithreaded performance-per-dollar, which outpaced Intel's Core i9-7900X, alongside 64 PCI Express Gen 3 lanes for superior I/O and support for quad-channel memory. The review noted that the aggressive pricing made the platform a compelling choice for professional users. Conversely, the platform's drawbacks included lower lightly-threaded performance compared to Intel's higher IPC, as well as a high 180W TDP necessitating robust cooling solutions. The multi-die topology also resulted in higher memory and cache latency, and the new TR4 socket meant users required entirely new motherboards.

The PC Perspective review of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core) and 1920X (12-core) highlights AMD’s re-entry into the HEDT market, showcasing a "Zen" multi-die architecture with 64 PCIe 3.0 lanes for superior connectivity. The CPUs, which utilize "Game Mode" (NUMA) and "Creator Mode" (UMA) to optimize latency, provide exceptional multi-threaded performance, with the 1950X outperforming Intel's 10-core i9-7900X by up to 37% in rendering tasks like Blender. While praised for its value and "mega-tasking" capabilities, the platform suffers from higher power consumption and lower single-threaded performance compared to Intel, along with requiring expensive TR4 motherboards.

The Tom's Hardware review of the 12-core, 24-thread AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X highlights its strength as a high-end desktop (HEDT) processor, offering superior value in multi-threaded workstation tasks. Pros include exceptional rendering and encoding performance, a soldered heat spreader for better thermals, and 64 PCIe lanes. Conversely, the 1920X faces limitations in gaming due to higher latency in its multi-die "Infinity Fabric" architecture, which can cause performance penalties. The CPU requires "Game Mode" or "Creator Mode" toggles, necessitating reboots, and it suffers from high power consumption, drawing significant power under load. Ultimately, the 1920X is praised as a "tremendous opportunity" for professionals needing high connectivity and multi-tasking, offering a strong alternative to Intel. While gaming performance and lower IPC compared to rivals are drawbacks, the 1920X brings high-core-count computing to an competitive price point.

This Igor's Lab review examines the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X, highlighting their position as high-performance workstation CPUs that, despite using soldered heat spreaders for better thermal management, possess significant power consumption and heat output. Key findings include a high idle power draw over 90W and substantial load spikes, with the review strongly recommending high-end cooling solutions to manage temperatures under heavy, multi-threaded workloads. While the CPUs excel in rendering, the review notes a high entry cost, mediocre single-threaded performance compared to mainstream alternatives, and the necessity of "Game Mode" to optimize gaming performance. igor´

AnandTech’s review finds that the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X disrupt the high-end desktop market by offering superior core counts and 64 PCIe lanes at competitive price points, with the 16-core 1950X dominating in heavy, multi-threaded workloads. Key advantages include exceptional multi-threaded performance-per-dollar, excellent workstation capabilities, and a stable X399 platform supporting quad-channel memory. However, the processors are hindered by high power consumption (180W TDP), significant thermal output requiring heavy cooling, and relatively lower performance in gaming compared to Intel counterparts.

The GamersNexus review of the AMD Threadripper 1950X and 1920X highlights these CPUs as dominant in production workloads, with the 16-core 1950X outperforming the Intel i9-7900X in multi-threaded tasks. Key advantages include 64 PCIe lanes and superior value for content creators, though high power consumption under overclocking and mixed gaming performance are notable downsides. While gaming requires a system-rebooting "Game Mode" to fix stuttering, the platform is considered a "no-brainer" for professional workstations, offering better multi-threaded value than competitive Intel alternatives. Copy

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X heavily disrupt the HEDT market, offering superior core counts and multi-threaded performance, particularly with the 1950X outperforming the Intel Core i9-7900X in rendering and encoding. Key advantages include 64 PCIe lanes and an effective, stable X399 platform, though the 1920X faces a tougher recommendation due to high platform costs. However, the processors suffer from lower single-threaded performance in gaming, requirement of a reboot for "Game Mode," significant cooling challenges due to large heatspreaders, and limited overclocking headroom. For more details, visit bit-tech.net. Copy

The HEXUS review of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core) and 1920X (12-core) highlights them as revolutionary HEDT processors, designed for creators utilizing the new TR4 socket and X399 chipset. They offer exceptional multi-threaded performance in rendering and production, with the 1950X outperforming comparable Intel chips in tests like Cinebench. Key pros include massive PCIe lane counts and quad-channel memory across the board, alongside strong XFR frequencies. Cons primarily revolve around high 180W TDP power consumption and high heat output requiring superior cooling, plus lower relative performance in gaming scenarios compared to Intel. Copy

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is characterized by Guru3D as a high-end, 12-core/24-thread CPU offering exceptional multi-threaded performance for professional workstations and content creation at a competitive $799 price point. Key advantages include strong single-threaded boost capabilities up to 4.0 GHz, massive connectivity via the X399 chipset's 64 PCIe Gen 3.0 lanes, and solid, stable memory support. However, the processor presents notable disadvantages, including high power consumption and significant heat output that necessitates robust cooling, along with gaming performance that is not superior to cheaper, lower-core alternatives. For more details, visit Guru3D. Copy

KitGuru's review highlights the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16C/32T) and 1920X (12C/24T) as major disruptors in the HEDT market, offering superior multi-threaded performance against Intel alternatives. Key pros include 64 PCIe lanes and quad-channel DDR4 support across all models. However, the chips face cons in gaming, with lower single-threaded IPC and higher latency, alongside high power consumption (180W TDP) necessitating robust cooling. The 1920X is noted for strong value, making Threadripper a top choice for content creators. For more details, visit KitGuru. Copy

The PC Perspective review of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core) and 1920X (12-core) marks a significant entry into the HEDT market, offering robust multi-threaded performance and 64 PCIe lanes to challenge Intel's lineup. Key advantages include exceptional rendering and "mega-tasking" capabilities, along with flexible memory modes to balance latency and bandwidth, according to the review. However, the review notes higher power consumption, the necessity for robust liquid cooling, and the requirement of "Game Mode" for certain applications to fix latency issues, along with high platform costs. Copy