AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX Avis | 78 Données comparées

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is a 32-core, 64-thread processor built on the 12nm Zen+ architecture, designed to deliver unprecedented multi-tasking and rendering capabilities. Pros include world-class multi-threaded performance that outclasses competitors in Cinebench, competitive pricing, and compatibility with existing X399 motherboards. However, the chip requires extreme cooling for its 250W TDP and suffers from inconsistent performance in non-optimized applications due to its NUMA design, making it a specialized tool for professionals rather than gamers.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX, analyzed by ServeTheHome, is a 32-core/64-thread workstation processor offering immense multi-threaded performance for rendering and video encoding, delivering high value compared to Intel competitors at its $1,799 price point. The review highlights superior performance in tasks like POV-Ray, driven by 12nm "Zen+" architecture, but notes it requires specialized, heavily threaded workloads. Significant constraints include a 250W TDP and a unique four-die topology where only two dies have direct memory access, resulting in high latency for some applications.

The TechSpot review identifies the 16-core AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X as the superior all-around high-end desktop CPU, offering improved efficiency and performance over its predecessor with a 5-8% boost. The 32-core 2990WX is highlighted as a specialized workstation "monster" for rendering, frequently beating Intel's flagship, though it suffers from severe bandwidth bottlenecks in memory-sensitive, non-rendering tasks. While the 2950X is praised for its balance, the 2990WX requires extreme cooling and power, with the review recommending the 2950X for most users and the 2990WX only for professional, heavily threaded workloads.

The Guru3D review finds the 32-core AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX to be a "monstrous" workstation processor that dominates in multi-threaded tasks like 3D rendering but faces performance bottlenecks in general desktop applications. Pros include exceptional content creation value on the X399 platform, improved memory support, and effective auto-overclocking via XFR2, alongside a "Game Mode" to improve gaming compatibility. However, the CPU suffers from "NUMA" memory access latency and high power draw, making it a specialized tool rather than a general-purpose CPU. For more details, visit Guru3D.

Tom's Hardware reviews the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and 2950X, highlighting a major expansion in high-end desktop (HEDT) performance. The 32-core 2990WX boasts unmatched multi-threaded power for rendering, though its unique quad-die architecture leads to poor scaling in bandwidth-sensitive, non-optimized tasks. Conversely, the 16-core 2950X is praised as a versatile "crowd-pleaser" for enthusiasts, offering better gaming and daily application performance, alongside Precision Boost Overdrive (PBO) for automated overclocking. Both CPUs leverage a 12nm process for better efficiency and feature 64 PCIe 3.0 lanes, with the 2950X serving as the recommended option for most users over the niche, compute-heavy 2990WX.

The 2nd Gen AMD Ryzen Threadripper review by AEC Magazine highlights a significant workstation market shift with the 32-core 2990WX and 16-core 2950X, leveraging the 12nm "Zen+" architecture for improved clock speeds and power management. These processors, particularly the 2990WX, offer exceptional multi-threaded performance for ray-tracing and design-viz, with features like Precision Boost Overdrive (PBO) and Dynamic Local Mode (DLM) optimizing performance, all while maintaining compatibility with X399 motherboards. While praised for their high core count and price-to-performance ratio, the processors are power-hungry, with the 2990WX drawing over 500W, and they require high-end cooling, with the potential for inconsistent performance in applications not optimized for 32 cores.

The DEVELOP3D review highlights the 2nd Generation AMD Ryzen Threadripper, particularly the 32-core 2990WX, as a major workstation shift offering unprecedented rendering power based on 12nm Zen+ architecture. A key pro is its massive multi-core performance in tasks like 4K rendering in KeyShot, which nearly matches more expensive dual Xeon systems. However, a significant con is the extreme power consumption, drawing over 500W with Precision Boost Overdrive (PBO), which requires high-end cooling. For single-threaded applications like CAD, the 2990WX holds its own, often outperforming older configurations. The 16-core 2950X is identified as a more practical option for most designers due to its balance of price and performance, and a notable advantage is the platform's drop-in compatibility with existing X399 motherboards. A potential disadvantage, however, is that adoption by major global OEMs like Dell and HP remains uncertain, which could limit its reach in large-scale enterprise environments compared to Intel's established Xeon line.

The Techgage review highlights the 32-core AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX as a dominant HEDT workstation processor, offering unrivalled rendering performance in applications like Cinebench. Key advantages include its massive multi-threading capabilities, compatibility with existing X399 motherboards, and surprisingly manageable thermal efficiency for its class. However, the 2990WX faces challenges due to its unique architecture, where only two of the four dies have direct memory access, leading to potential performance dips in memory-intensive tasks and some video encoding workloads. The review notes that the chip is not ideal for gaming and requires specialized software optimization to achieve maximum performance. Ultimately, Techgage awarded the 2990WX an Editor's Choice award, recommending it for specialized content creators who can leverage its massive 32-core count. The processor is praised for offering "sublime" performance in rendering, despite being a specialized, high-cost product.

The AMD Threadripper 2990WX is identified as the top-performing single-CPU solution for V-Ray rendering, delivering 46% faster rendering times than the Intel Core i9-7980XE at a lower price point. It provides unparalleled multi-threaded performance, making it an excellent choice for workstation users focused on heavy rendering tasks, often outperforming much more expensive dual-CPU setups. However, the processor suffers in tasks requiring high single-core speeds—such as modeling and animation in Cinema 4D—where it can fall behind cheaper chips, and its architecture can lead to performance issues in less optimized applications.

The Overclock3D review of AMD's 2nd Generation Threadripper CPUs distinguishes the 16-core 2950X as a balanced choice for gaming and content creation, while the 32-core 2990WX is positioned as a specialized "number crunching" workstation beast. A key advantage for the 2950X is its improved efficiency and higher overclocking potential via Precision Boost 2, whereas the 2990WX faces limitations in non-optimized software due to its unique "four-die" architecture. In testing, the 2990WX dominates in heavily threaded applications like Blender, but the review notes a significant drawback: poor performance in certain legacy apps and games where the 2950X actually proves faster. The 2950X shines as a capable, high-end gaming option, earning the OC3D Enthusiast Award. Both processors require extreme power and cooling, necessitating a 1200W PSU and high-end AIO liquid cooling to manage temperatures, which can spike dramatically on the 2990WX under load. The review highlights these chips as impressive, yet demanding, enthusiast hardware. Copy

The bit-tech review highlights the 32-core AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX as a specialized workstation powerhouse, offering unmatched rendering performance in applications like Cinebench and POV-Ray. Its major cons stem from a unique architecture where only two of four dies have direct memory access, causing performance bottlenecks, alongside high power consumption and immense heat. Conversely, the 16-core Threadripper 2950X is presented as a more versatile all-rounder, utilizing the 12nm Zen+ architecture and Precision Boost 2 for improved efficiency. It provides consistent performance across general desktop tasks and gaming, overcoming the 2990WX's inconsistency issues, though it only offers modest improvements over its predecessor, the 1950X. The review concludes that the 2950X offers the best value for enthusiasts, while the 2990WX is strictly for specialized multi-threaded workloads. Both chips benefit from continued X399 platform support, but both require robust, top-tier cooling systems. Copy

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is a 32-core, 64-thread workstation processor based on the 12nm Zen+ architecture, designed for immense multi-threaded performance in rendering and encoding. It operates at a 3.0 GHz base clock with high power demands (250W TDP) and utilizes the existing X399 platform. Pros include top-tier rendering performance, 64 PCIe lanes, and excellent overclocking potential to 4.1 GHz across all cores, making it ideal for heavy workstation workloads. Cons include high power consumption and poor performance in non-parallelized tasks (e.g., gaming, specific compression) due to memory latency, often requiring a "Game Mode" to disable cores, as reported by Guru3D. Copy

AnandTech’s review of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2nd Generation highlights the 32-core 2990WX and 16-core 2950X as disruptive processors offering unmatched multi-threaded performance in rendering and AI workloads. Pros include dominant workstation capabilities and competitive pricing, with the 2950X praised for improved boost algorithms and a lower launch price than its predecessor. However, significant cons for the 2990WX arise from high memory latency and severe bandwidth bottlenecks, as only half of its dies have direct DRAM access, leading to poor performance in tasks not perfectly parallelized. Ultimately, the 2990WX is deemed a niche product for highly specialized tasks, while the 2950X is recommended as the better choice for general high-end desktop users. Copy

The HEXUS review of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX highlights the 32-core/64-thread processor as a "monster" workstation chip, capable of delivering immense multi-threaded performance, often beating Intel's top HEDT offerings by over 70% in rendering tasks like Cinebench and Blender. However, the 2990WX faces significant limitations due to its NUMA architecture, resulting in high memory latency that causes "crippled" gaming performance at 1080p without utilizing a specific, restrictive "Game Mode". While offering an easy upgrade path for existing X399 platforms, the 2990WX is deemed a highly specialized tool characterized by high power consumption (up to 525W overclocked) and a steep $1,799 price, making it less suitable for general-purpose users compared to the Threadripper 2950X. Copy

The AMD Threadripper 2990WX is a 32-core, 64-thread workstation processor optimized for heavy rendering tasks like Blender, offering superior multi-threaded performance at a lower price point than competitors. While it excels in specific, heavily threaded applications, the CPU faces limitations due to an architecture where only two of four dies have direct memory access, resulting in lower performance in memory-sensitive and less-threaded tasks. Ultimately, the review defines this 250W TDP processor as a niche tool for specialized professionals rather than general users or gamers, advising the 2950X or Intel alternatives for more balanced needs. Copy

The Armari Magnetar S32T-RD1000G2 workstation, reviewed by KitGuru, showcases the 32-core AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX, delivering unmatched multi-threaded performance with a 5,739 Cinebench R15 score, roughly 53% faster than the Intel i9-7980XE. The system utilizes a custom, robust chassis with an Enermax Liqtech TR4 liquid cooler to manage the CPU's high power demands. Key pros include best-in-class 3D rendering capabilities, solid single-core performance for CAD, and effective overclocking via Precision Boost Overdrive. Despite its strengths, the review notes notable cons, including underwhelming Adobe Media Encoder CC 2017 performance, which fell behind the 16-core 1950X, pointing to limited software optimization for such high thread counts. Furthermore, the system experienced difficulties stabilizing memory at speeds above 3,000MHz, and the chassis design makes internal access less convenient. The 2990WX shines in raw workstation tasks but requires specific software tuning to maximize its potential. Copy