Intel Core i9 7960X Avis | 78 Données comparées

The Techgage review compares the 16-core Intel Core i9-7960X and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, focusing on workstation performance in rendering and media creation. The i9-7960X is noted for superior single-threaded performance and efficiency in applications like Blender and Adobe Premiere Pro 4K, though it carries a higher price and power consumption. Conversely, the AMD Threadripper 1950X is identified as the value-focused option, offering competitive multi-threaded performance and superior platform expandability, while occasionally underperforming in specific, less-threaded tasks.

In a direct comparison by PCWorld, the Intel Core i9-7960X outperformed the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, holding a roughly 20% performance lead in benchmarks like Corona Renderer due to higher clock speeds. While the i9-7960X excels in raw, multi-threaded power, the Threadripper 1950X offers superior value at $700 less, making it a competitive choice for workstation performance. Ultimately, the Intel chip is deemed the performance leader, but the Threadripper is considered the better, budget-friendly option.

The Intel Core i9-7980XE and i9-7960X represent top-tier HEDT performance, featuring 18 and 16 cores respectively, which dominate in 3D rendering and video encoding, often outperforming the competition by 15-20%. Key pros include exceptional multi-threaded productivity, strong AVX-512 support for scientific workloads, and unmatched speed in professional applications. However, the chips are characterized by extreme power consumption, drawing significantly more wattage than competitor Threadripper CPUs and requiring massive cooling solutions to manage intense heat output. These processors are described as "power hungry," with overclocked scenarios placing massive strain on system components. The high cost of ownership is a significant disadvantage, with the i9-7980XE priced at roughly double that of its main competitor, resulting in a poor value proposition for most users. The review advises that while these chips offer supreme speed for creative professionals, they are not recommended for gaming.

The Phoronix review of the Intel Core i9-7960X highlights a high-end desktop (HEDT) processor, featuring 16 cores and 32 threads, tested on Ubuntu 17.10 with the Linux 4.13 kernel for strong X299 chipset support. It boasts a 2.8GHz base clock with 4.4GHz Turbo Boost Max 3.0, aimed at challenging AMD’s Threadripper 1950X with 44 PCIe lanes and AVX-512 support. Pros include superior IPC performance, outperforming the Threadripper 1950X by up to 22% in heavily threaded benchmarks. The processor demonstrated manageable thermals using a high-end air cooler, peaking around 61°C in intensive workloads. However, significant cons include a high $1,699 launch price compared to the $999 Threadripper 1950X, making it a difficult value proposition for many users. While average power consumption was comparable to AMD, the i9-7960X recorded a higher peak power draw of 293 Watts.

The Intel Core i9-7960X is a 16-core, 32-thread high-end desktop (HEDT) processor designed for intensive content creation, delivering massive multi-core performance based on the Skylake-X architecture. PCMag's review highlights that the chip is roughly 80% faster than the previous 10-core flagship, the i7-6950X, in heavy multi-core tasks. Key pros include excellent single-threaded speeds—beating AMD's Threadripper by about 15%—and a strong value proposition compared to the higher-end 18-core i9-7980XE. However, the $1,699 price point makes it significantly more expensive than the AMD Threadripper 1950X, offering only a marginal performance lead for the higher cost. Additional drawbacks noted in the review include the high cost of the required X299 platform and the need for robust cooling to handle the high heat output and power draw. Furthermore, the platform offers fewer PCI Express lanes (44) compared to the 64 lanes available on competing AMD platforms. PCMag

The Gamers Nexus review of the Intel i9-7980XE and i9-7960X characterizes these HEDT processors as maximum-performance, high-power solutions, with the 7980XE securing the fastest consumer CPU title in heavily threaded applications. While offering a 15–20% performance lead over AMD, these chips feature extreme power consumption—reaching up to 490W when overclocked—and high operating temperatures due to the use of TIM instead of solder. The review notes that delidding reduces temperatures by up to 17°C, highlighting that stock performance is bottlenecked by thermal constraints. Ultimately, the review identifies these CPUs as specialized, high-cost, and high-heat tools for professionals, arguing that the cons regarding power, thermals, and price-to-performance outweigh the benefits for general users.

HotHardware's review identifies the Intel Core i9-7980XE (18-core) and i9-7960X (16-core) as top-tier high-end desktop (HEDT) processors, reclaiming performance leadership from AMD Threadripper with superior multi-threaded results in Cinebench and Blender. Built on the Skylake-X architecture, these chips offer immense productivity power, though the 16-core model sometimes leads in specific tasks due to higher clock speeds. Key advantages include stellar multi-core performance, excellent single-threaded speed, and significant overclocking potential, enabling over 4.5GHz on all 18 cores. However, the review highlights extreme thermal output, power consumption exceeding 400–600 watts when overclocked, and a high $1,999 launch price for the i9-7980XE as major drawbacks. While performance is top-tier, the incremental gains over AMD's competition sometimes struggle to justify the price premium, making them niche for general users.

The PCWorld review highlights the Intel Core i9-7980XE and i9-7960X as dominant, high-core-count processors, with the 18-core i9-7980XE reclaiming the performance crown in heavily multi-threaded tasks like 3D rendering. A key advantage is their versatility, offering high boost clocks for lighter workloads alongside massive multi-core power, although they suffer from high power consumption exceeding 400 watts when overclocked. However, the chips carry a massive price premium, costing roughly twice as much as competitive AMD alternatives while only providing a 15-20% performance lead in specific scenarios. Finally, the review notes thermal challenges, specifically criticizing the use of thermal paste rather than solder under the heat spreader, positioning these processors as specialized, expensive tools for professional content creators.

The Intel Core i9-7960X, a 16-core/32-thread Skylake-X processor, delivers top-tier performance for high-end desktop (HEDT) workloads. It excels in rendering and heavy multitasking, providing 44 PCIe 3.0 lanes and supporting AVX-512 instructions, though it faces stiff competition with a high $1,699 launch price. A significant disadvantage is its high 165W TDP paired with thermal paste (TIM) rather than solder, resulting in intense thermal management requirements and potential bottlenecks.

The Scan Pro Audio review of the Intel i9-7940X and i9-7960X processors highlights exceptional DAWBench performance, showing significant scaling for high-end audio production with their 14 and 16 cores respectively. Key pros include superior raw processing power and, contrary to initial concerns, good performance out of the box with proper cooling. However, the cons center on diminishing returns, with the 7960X offering a higher cost-per-core and substantial heat output at 165W TDP. While these chips are ideal for heavy-duty, real-time virtual instrument tasks, the review notes they may be overkill for average users. Copy

The TweakTown review identifies the Intel Core i9-7980XE and i9-7960X as premium, 18-core processors designed for extreme multi-threaded performance. These chips, featuring a new mesh architecture, offer unparalleled raw power while maintaining strong single-core speeds suitable for gaming and general tasks. Key advantages include exceptional overclocking capabilities, with tests showing an all-core 4.4GHz boost, alongside improved heat dissipation due to a larger die size. However, the processors come with high-end requirements, including the need for robust X299 motherboards and specialized liquid cooling to manage thermal output. While the larger die helps, the continued use of thermal paste instead of soldering is noted as a drawback. The $1,999 launch price of the i9-7980XE and high power consumption (exceeding 500W when overclocked) positions these as luxury, niche products. Overall, the review highlights them as unmatched in raw performance at the time of release but at a very high cost. Copy