AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 Avis | 78 Données comparées

A T3 review of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H versus the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 highlights a major performance shift, with Intel leading in raw processing power (approx. 22% better) and integrated graphics via the Arc 140T GPU, while AMD remains competitive on price and NPU AI tasks. Intel's 16-core design outperformed the 10-core AMD chip in gaming, achieving 32fps in Cyberpunk 2077 compared to AMD’s 20fps, though higher-tier AMD models might close this gap. Despite AMD's reputation for efficiency, the Intel laptop delivered superior, longer battery life (15h 47m vs 13h 11m), largely aided by a larger battery capacity in the test unit. Pros and Cons ASUS Zenbook Duo 14" Intel Core Ultra 9 Laptop£1,688.99£1,699& more pricesLaptop Outlet& more4.3(12.2k)Offers superior multi-core performance and best-in-class integrated graphics but may appear in more expensive laptops.MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-028UK AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 Laptop 40.6£1,499.99& more pricesScan.co.uk& more3.8(26)Features better NPU performance for AI tasks and higher affordability, though it trails in raw CPU power and gaming frame rates.

The Phoronix review of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 highlights its 10-core/20-thread hybrid architecture (Zen 5/5C) as a benchmark for power efficiency, often surpassing the higher-end Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 in performance-per-watt. Key performance data shows the 365 matching older, higher-power chips like the Ryzen 7 7840HS while operating at roughly 40% lower power consumption during tasks like Linux kernel compilation. However, the chip is a cut-down version with lower boost clocks (5.0GHz) and fewer cores compared to the HX 370, leading to less impressive raw performance in specific workloads. A significant challenge identified is the wide variation in performance caused by vendor-defined TDP ranges (15W–54W), which can result in inconsistent user experiences. While the Radeon 880M graphics and overall Linux compatibility are strong, the NPU requires out-of-tree drivers, requiring modern software stacks (Linux 6.10+, Mesa 24.1+) to reach full potential. Despite these software-related caveats, the processor offers a major efficiency leap over previous generations and competes strongly with Intel's Meteor Lake. For more details, visit Phoronix.

The Phoronix review of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ("Strix Point") highlights the 10-core processor as a significant advancement in Linux power efficiency, offering performance comparable to older Zen 4 chips while operating at much lower power, such as 24 Watts during compilation compared to a predecessor's 41 Watts. Key pros include exceptional performance-per-Watt in workloads like V-RAY and 7-Zip, alongside strong RDNA 3.5 graphics performance (Radeon 880M) using open-source Mesa drivers on Linux. However, cons include the requirement for out-of-tree AMD XDNA drivers for NPU acceleration, the need for a very recent Linux 6.10+ kernel/Mesa 24.1+ stack, and slightly lower multi-threaded performance compared to the higher-end AI 9 HX 370.

The AMD Ryzen AI 300 series ("Strix Point") introduces a hybrid architecture with up to 12 Zen 5 cores and upgraded RDNA 3.5 graphics for Copilot+ laptops. Key models include the top-tier Ryzen AI 9 HX 370/375 and the 10-core Ryzen AI 9 365, focusing on delivering high efficiency and AI capabilities in premium thin-and-light designs. Pros include a 15% IPC uplift, excellent Radeon 890M iGPU performance rivaling entry-level dedicated GPUs, and 50 TOPS from the XDNA 2 NPU for local AI tasks. The platform, featured in devices like the ASUS Zenbook S 16, offers superior battery life and reduced fan noise compared to previous generations. Cons involve limited performance compared to high-power Intel Core HX or Ryzen Dragon Range chips, along with high price points restricting these to premium models. Additionally, early adopters have noted potential scheduling inconsistencies, and the iGPU in the Ryzen AI 9 365 offers only marginal gains over the 780M. Copy