Intel Core i3 10110U Avis | 78 Données comparées

The Intel Core i3-10110U is a 10th-generation Comet Lake mobile processor featuring two cores and four threads, operating at a base clock of 2.1 GHz with a 4.1 GHz boost. Based on PassMark data, it serves as a reliable entry-level option for basic tasks and office work, though its 14nm architecture and low core count fall behind modern competitors in performance. Key pros include its efficient 15W Thermal Design Power (TDP), supporting good battery life and potential passive cooling, alongside solid single-thread performance that ensures responsiveness in daily applications. Furthermore, the processor supports up to 64 GB of RAM, offering significant memory expandability for systems. Cons center on limited multitasking, as the dual-core design struggles with heavy workloads like video encoding. The integrated Intel UHD Graphics is considered outdated, lagging behind newer Intel solutions, and the CPU may feel sluggish under demanding, multi-application use. For the full benchmark data, visit PassMark.

LaptopMedia finds that while the Core i3-10110U and i3-1005G1 share a $281 price point and 2-core/4-thread architecture, the i3-10110U (Comet Lake) offers roughly 7% faster CPU performance, whereas the i3-1005G1 (Ice Lake) dominates with 79% faster integrated graphics and faster memory support. Both processors are criticized for having only two cores, which constitutes a performance bottleneck for modern multitasking, forcing users to manage browser tabs carefully. Ultimately, the i3-1005G1 is declared the winner for its superior GPU, but both are deemed overpriced, with the reviewer suggesting an upgrade to an i5-1035G1 for better value.

LaptopMedia compares the Intel Core i3-10110U (Comet Lake) and i3-1005G1 (Ice Lake), noting that while both share a $281 price point, they offer distinct performance tradeoffs. The i3-10110U has a pro of higher clock speeds (up to 4.10 GHz), offering ~7% better Cinebench 20 performance, but its con is an aging GPU. Conversely, the i3-1005G1 features a more modern 10nm process, faster LPDDR4-3733 memory, and a massive 79% advantage in integrated graphics. Ultimately, the i3-1005G1 wins due to superior graphics performance, though both chips are considered poor value for money. The review suggests avoiding these 2-core/4-thread options for a slightly more expensive quad-core i5-1035G1 or cheaper Pentium alternatives.